Purpose: The purpose of this qualitative grounded theory study was to 1) explore the critical factors that influence therapeutic adherence among hypertensive patients residing in the US Virgin Islands; 2) identify the attitudes of US Virgin Islanders that may influence therapeutic adherence; and 3) determine the health beliefs of US Virgin Islanders that may influence therapeutic adherence.
Philosophical Underpinnings: Grounded Theory is based in the Naturalist Constructivist paradigm and is informed by the philosophical constraints of symbolic interactionism and pragmatism.
Method: The research approach was qualitative. Grounded Theory was used to uncover a substantive theory that could articulate the critical factors influencing adherence to therapeutic medical management among the hypertensive population residing in the United States Virgin Islands.
Design: Strauss and Corbin’s Grounded Theory method guided the data collection and analysis of this study. Purposive, snowball and theoretical sampling were utilized respectively in this study. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews. Interviews were conducted with twenty-one individual participants and then with a focus group of four participants. The process of data collection and analysis was simultaneous; data was scrutinized as themes and categories were extrapolated using open, axial and theoretical coding techniques. This process yielded five main categories and sixteen subcategories, which were further conceptualized into a substantive theory that offered a conceptual description of the phenomenon.
Results: The main categories that emerged to describe the behavior of adherence to therapeutic medical management in the hypertensive population form the United States Virgin Islands were (1) mistrusting, (2) reacting, (3) educating, (4) socializing and (5) financing. These categories were supported by the subcategories (1a) perceived lack of provider, (1b) perceived lack of provider cultural sensitivity, (1c) perceived lack of adequate provider credentialing, (1d) perceived inflation of healthcare cost, (2a) fear of complications (2b) symptom-based management, (3a) denying, (3b) relying, (3c) owing, (3d) defying, (4a) dietary influences, (4b) use of herbal remedies, (4c) strong sense of spiritually, (5a) healthy eating purchasing medications and (5b) long-term sustainability. The interfacing and critical analysis of these categories and subcategories led to the development of the social process of deciding. Deciding is conceptualized as the most active and finite process that offers an in-depth description of the dynamic process of adherence to a hypertensive regimen among hypertensive individuals from this population.
Conclusion: The theoretical framework constructed in this study is useful to inform nursing education, practice research and policy. Ethno-cultural effective care is an essential component of efficacious disease management. This study provides insights that could prove useful in informing care initiatives for the population from the United States Virgin Islands and other like populations.