METHODS: This descriptive cross-sectional study focuses on prelicensure programs in nursing, medicine and pharmacy. A survey, adapted from a list of learning objectives used by Mezei and colleagues (2011) to assess pain curricula at schools in the U.S. and Canada, was developed to determine the scope, quantity, and delivery of pain education. Part one of the survey focuses on general pain education topics and teaching methods used, while part two focuses specifically on opioid education. This two-part survey will be administered using a web-based platform to evaluate the depth and breadth of pain education taught at nursing, medical and pharmacy schools across the nation. School demographic information will also be obtained.
RESULTS: Descriptive statistics will be used to characterize the sample and examine individual survey items. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) will be conducted to examine potential differences between the schools. Qualitative survey data will be content analyzed. Findings will reflect opportunities for improvement in nursing, medical and pharmacy schools' pain curriculums across the United States.
CONCLUSIONS: When designing a pain education curriculum, more emphasis should be placed on patient education, patient empowerment, and interprofessional collaboration. The consensus is that nursing, medical and pharmacy schools in the United States should establish formal integration of pain management education across curricula. This will enable graduating healthcare professionals to be well equipped to improve patient outcomes and reduce this public health crisis.