Purposes: (1) To determine whether the mean Assessment Technologies Institute (ATI)© individual test score is different between students taught using CT versus those using traditional pedagogy (control); (2) To examine what was the difference in scores before and after CT; and (3) To evaluation student satisfaction of CT among students exposed to CT
Method: A quasi-experimental, comparative, non-equivalent approach was used in this project. Students enrolled in the last nursing essential course were participants in the project. CT was used as the educational pedagogy with intervention group (CT group) whereas the control cohort was taught in the traditional teaching strategy
Results: The CT group showed significant change in the scores before and after CT. There was no difference in the ATI predictor assessments scores between two groups. Sixty-one percent of the students from the CT group considered the usefulness of CT high or exceptional. Over 85% of the students reported CT increased their critical thinking and improved social skills.
Conclusion: CT improved student's short-term scores but not ATI predictor assessments' scores. CT also helped improve clinical reasoning, clarifying confusing questions, and working together in the CT group.
See more of: Oral Paper & Poster: Education Sessions