Background: CBC is a teaching methodology that enhances learning by assisting students to think critically; students link knowledge gained in the didactic settings or from previous patient-care experiences to apply to the current situation or to clinical practice. Motivated by rapid changes in technology and a shift to population and global health, chronic disease management, and health promotion there is a need to reexamine graduate nursing education curricula. CBC is currently implemented in some nursing programs across the United States, particularly in undergraduate programs. The strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) of undergraduate CBC offer sound evidence for curriculum change. Graduate curricular mapping to national standards and guidelines will also be addressed.
Methods: A systematic search of the literature was conducted to determine the state of the science of concept-based curriculum’s implementation in graduate nursing education programs. The databases of Academic Search Complete, ProQuest Nursing, CINAHL, ERIC, and PubMed were searched using the search terms: nursing, education, concept(s), concept-based, graduate nursing education, MSN education, DNP education, and PhD nursing education. Inclusion criteria was limited to English, peer-reviewed journals, texts, and articles; academic and research publications for the years 1990-2018. Additionally, the search was expanded to include interdisciplinary health professions, such as medicine, dentistry, and pharmacy that might offer insight for development, implementation and evaluation of CBC.
Results: Sadly, very few articles were retrieved regarding CBC use in graduate nursing education in the United States. The few articles that met eligibility are included in the qualitative synthesis of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) to CBC. The SWOT analysis is categorized by CBC development, implementation into the curriculum, and evaluation of the implementation. Suggested curriculum mapping to national graduate standards and guidelines is included.
Conclusion: Concept-based curricular approaches were found to promote higher levels of thinking, such as evaluating, analyzing, and processing; and to improve critical thinking and clinical judgment as students apply new knowledge within the frame of the concept and analyze information. More research is needed on this topic. Programmatic implementation strategies are described and outcome metrics are identified that may serve as benchmarks for programs and regulators.