Physical Activity in Teens: Influence of Gender and Socioeconomic Status

Monday, 31 October 2011

Stephanie A. Kelly, PhD, FNP-C1
Bernadette Mazurek Melnyk, PhD, RN, CPNP/PMHNP, FNAP, FAAN2
Diana L. Jacobson, PhD, RN, PNP-BC1
Judith O'Haver, PhD, RN, CPNP1
(1)College of Nursing & Health Innovation, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ
(2)College of Nursing, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH

Learning Objective 1: Understand differences in types of physical activity performed by gender and socioeconomic status.

Learning Objective 2: Understand differences in places adolescents perform physical activity by gender and socioeconomic status.

Purpose: The purpose of this analysis was to assess differences in types of physical activity and places where teens are physically active between males and females and between students at high and low socioeconomic status (SES) schools.

Background: Physical activity is an important component of a healthy lifestyle.  Boys and teens living in higher SES neighborhoods are typically more physically active.  Less is understood about the types of physical activities teens participate in based on their gender and SES. 

Methods: Independent-samples t-tests were conducted with a convenience sample of 404 high school students with a mean age of 15.1 years. Participants were sampled from required health/physical education classes in the Southwest region of the United States.

 Results: Significant differences existed in the types of physical activities teens participated in as well as how often they go to places to be physically active. Boys reported more frequent physical activity at basketball courts (p=.001), playing fields (p=.035), and at the YMCA/Boys and Girls club (p=.019).  Girls reported being more active at shopping malls (p=.000).  Students at the low SES school reported walking to school more (p=.000).  Students at the high SES school reported greater frequency in exercising at a gym outside of school (p=.000) and playing a sport at school or another organized club (p=.000). 

Implications: Understanding the influence of gender and SES status on physical activity can assist in tailoring interventions to meet the needs of those participating. Students at low SES schools would benefit from activities planned at local fields or with active transport to school.  Students at high SES schools would benefit from encouragement to participate in organized sports.  Targeting physical activity for girls at a shopping mall may be effective and planning activities at local basketball courts or fields may encourage boys to be physically active.