Learning Objective #1: Describe knowledge compilation, evaluation, and assimilation | |||
Learning Objective #2: Outline a model of evidence for clinical-decisions support systems |
Developers of Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) must devise efficient ways to translate knowledge to practice as the debate continues over the best evidence to guide nursing practice. Most existing technology uses either textbooks or clinical guidelines as a support base for determining diagnoses and interventions. But is this adequate? When nurses are relying on a computerized system to assist them when making critical decisions, what evidence should be used to develop and maintain the system? In addition to developing a strategy to locate the best evidence to answer clinical questions, decisions are needed for “gray zones of nursing practice” where answers are not apparent.
Although randomized clinical trials are often considered the “gold standard” of evidence-based medical practice, they are inadequate in reflecting the complexities of nursing practice. Professional knowledge for nursing includes not only an understanding of the scientific basis for practice, but also a thorough grasp of the contextual and relational issues. This paper presents a comprehensive process model addressing these issues. The model outlines a procedure to uncover, evaluate and assimilate information to develop the knowledge domain for N-CODES (Novice Computer Decision Support System). Both formal and practice-based knowledge are included. A formula determines scientific confidence levels based on the collective of different types of evidence. The model contains several innovative approaches including the use of clinical experts and a network of practicing clinicians. This model will assist scientists and practitioners interested in determining the best evidence to support nursing practice.
Back to Evaluation of Decision-Making and Critical Thinking: Tools and Models
Back to 37th Biennial Convention - Clinical Sessions
Sigma Theta Tau International