Saturday, November 1, 2003
4:00 PM - 6:00 PM
Sunday, November 2, 2003
7:00 AM - 8:00 AM
Sunday, November 2, 2003
9:30 AM - 10:30 AM

This presentation is part of : Accepted Posters

Traditional Versus Evidence-Based Practice: Reducing Catheter-Related Blood-Stream Infections

Susanne Lori Nelson, BScN, Education, Education, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada

Traditional Versus Evidence-Based Practice: Reducing Catheter-Related Blood-Stream Infections

Blood-stream infection is the leading and most serious complication associated with vascular access. The majority of bloodstream infections begin with colonization of the vascular-access catheter insertion tract by bacteria from the patients’ own skin flora. The use of an appropriate skin antiseptic at the time of the catheter insertion and for subsequent catheter care is regarded as one of the most important measures in the prevention of vascular access related infection. It is essential that staff nurses, nurse educators, and advanced practice nurses work in collaboration with other disciplines (e.g., infection control, medicine, epidemiology) to advocate for evidenced based practice in their clinical areas. At present, in Ontario, a number of skin preparation solutions including 70% isopropyl alcohol, 0.5% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) and 10% povidone-iodine are being used. The purpose of this poster is to present the findings of a literature review conducted using multiple databases. The findings indicate that CHG is more effective in reducing catheter-related bloodstream infections than both povidone-iodine and isopropyl alcohol. The poster will also include multidisciplinary recommendations for practice changes and future research.

Back to Accepted Posters
Back to 37th Biennial Convention - Clinical Sessions
Sigma Theta Tau International