Poster Presentation
Halls C & D (Indiana Convention Center)
Saturday, November 12, 2005
4:00 PM - 6:00 PM
Halls C & D (Indiana Convention Center)
Sunday, November 13, 2005
7:00 AM - 8:00 AM
Halls C & D (Indiana Convention Center)
Sunday, November 13, 2005
9:30 AM - 10:30 AM
This presentation is part of : Poster Presentations
The Therapeutic Effect of Relaxation on Pain-Distress During an Invasive Procedure
David Harris, MSN, CPNP1, Brian Stahulak, BSN, RN, MBA2, and Joan M. Lokar, MSN, CPNP1. (1) Liver Transplant, Children's Memorial Hospital, chicago, IL, USA, (2) Ambulatory Department-Clark/Deming Building, Children's Memorial Hospital, chicago, IL, USA
Learning Objective #1: Identify the role of various nonpharmacological relaxation techniques in the reduction of pain-distress during invasive procedures
Learning Objective #2: Identify the variables being studied and their level of significance pertaining to control vs research groups

Bacground: the relief of pain-distress during invasive procedures is an important aspect of nursing care of pediatric patients. Several studies have shown that non-pharmacological adjuncts can be useful in the reduction of pain-distress ratings. The purpose of this study was to dtermine if two validated relaxation techniques, deep breathing and guided imagery, could significantly affect objective and subjective pain-distress measurements in children undergoing intravenous catheterization. Method: The sample consisted of 40 patients undergoing IV insertion. They were split into control and experimental group processes. The experimental group were taught two structured relaxation exercises, one using deep-breathing, and one using guided imagery. Pain-distress ratings using VAS and vital sign parameters were measured pre, during, and post insertion. Measurements were then compared to the group of 20 children that received the IV using a standard procedure and no relaxation. Results: There was a significant (p-.007) reduction in mean arterial pressure (MAP) during IV insertion in the experimental group. There were no significant differences in pain scores (VAS), heart rate or respiratory rate.