Learning Objective #1: Analyze problems and improvement strategies associated with the development, utilization, and evaluation of patient education information with emphasis on readability and comprehension | |||
Learning Objective #2: Understand the status of nursing and health care research regarding readability of patient education information |
Six hundred and sixty four participants were studied as they presented to emergency departments of these hospitals. Five commonly used PIMs were analyzed for readability using the SMOG formula with a resultant mean grade reading level required of 13.0. Results were compared to the last grade completed by the sample, a mean level of 11.26. A statistically significant difference (p< 0.001) was found between the reading level of the patient education information and the last grade completed by the sample.
Approximately 80% of the patients presenting to the selected emergency departments may have been unable to read and comprehend the materials based on the findings of the study. Studies have repeatedly shown that individuals read three to five grade levels below their last grade completed. If patients are to participate accurately in their care, providers of patient education information materials have a responsibility to develop and distribute readable materials written at appropriate grade levels for effective comprehension.
As the problem of discrepancy between the readability of patient education information and the educational levels of the target population becomes more evident and documented, registered nurses should assume a leadership role in assessing the information they routinely develop and distribute to patients and their significant others to assure the best outcomes possible. To make patient education information materials effective communication tools, registered nurses must be proactive in assessing these tools and initiating appropriate changes to serve clients and populations successfully.