Monday, November 3, 2003

This presentation is part of : Infant Care

Stability of Preterm Infant Responses to Heelsticks and Axillary Temperatures

Jane C. Evans, PhD, RN1, Eliza McCartney, MS, RNC, CPNP, CNS1, and Gretchen Lawhon, RN, PhD2. (1) School of Nursing, Medical College of Ohio, Toledo, OH, USA, (2) NIDCAP Federation International, Inc, Toledo, OH, USA
Learning Objective #1: Discuss preterm infant responses to the same and to different "painful" procedures in the NICU
Learning Objective #2: Identify the gestational age at which preterm infant behaviors distinguish "painful" from "non-painful" caregiving procedures

OBJECTIVE: Determine which biobehavioral responses within the Preterm Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) are reliably present in at least 80% of an individual infant's responses to repetitions of heelsticks and axillary temperatures.

DESIGN: Longitudinal descriptive comparative.

POPULATION: A convenience sample of 81 preterm infants was recruited from a Level III NICU between 1999-2001.

CONCEPTS: Theoretical model combined Levine's (1967) Conservation Model and Als (1982) Synactive Theory of Development. Biobehavioral variables: heart rate, oxygen saturation, eye squeeze, brow bulge, nasolabial furrow, and Preterm Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) scores. Contextual variables: gestational age, state, severity of illness, and number of prior painful procedures.

METHODS: Computer acquisition of physiological data synchronized with real time video recordings from 4 cameras captured caregiving activities and infant behavior for 4 hours every day during the first week of life, and weekly thereafter until discharge. Caregiving procedures and facial behaviors were coded from the videotapes into 3 epochs: two minute baseline, procedure, and two minutes following. Standard PIPP scores were also calculated. Data analysis included ANOVA, repeated measures ANOVA, regression, and descriptive statistics

FINDINGS: Preliminary analysis of the first caregiving procedures in a cluster yielded the following: A) Heelsticks: only heart rate increases were reliably present (96.2%), oxygen desaturations were present 59.2%, brow bulge 14.8%, eye squeeze 14.8% and nasolabial furrow 7.4%. B) Axillary temperature: again, only heart rate increases were reliably present (96.1%), oxygen desaturations were present 34.6%, brow bulge 1.9%, eye squeeze 3.8%, and nasolabial furrow 1.9%.

CONCLUSIONS: Heart rate increases did not discriminate between heelstick and axillary temperature. Oxygen desaturations, brow bulge, eye squeeze, and nasolabial furrow were not reliably present with either procedure.

IMPLICATIONS: Heart rate increases, oxygen desaturations, brow bulge, eye squeeze, and nasolabial furrows are not reliable indicators of pain in the preterm infant.

Back to Infant Care
Back to 37th Biennial Convention - Scientific Session
Sigma Theta Tau International