Monday, November 3, 2003

This presentation is part of : Development of the CATS: Child-Adolescent Teasing Scale

Development & Psychometric Evaluation of the Child-Adolescent Teasing Scale

Mary E. Duffy, PhD, FAAN1, Judith A. Vessey, PhD, MBA, FAAN1, June A. Horowitz, PhD, FAAN1, Karen L. Carlson, RNC, PhD2, Joan F. Bradley, RN, MSN2, Carolyn Montoya, RN, MSN, PNP2, and Joyce David, BSN, MSNc1. (1) School of Nursing, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA, (2) College of Nursing, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA

Development & Psychometric Evaluation of the Child-Adolescent Teasing Scale

Objective: This study's purpose was to develop and psychometrically evaluate the CATS in middle-school youth.

Design: methodological

Population, Sample, Setting: The initial study population (n=708) was middle-school youth from Massachusetts, Mississippi, Montana, New Mexico, and North Carolina. The final sample (n=546) for this psychometric evaluation had no missing data on the CATS. This sample was 11-14 years; 53% female; 73% white, 11% Latino/Hispanic, 10% Black/African American and 6.5% other racial/ethnic heritage. Over 68% reported grades of mostly A's and B's.

Concepts and Variables Studied: Initially, 70 items were derived from the previously described focus groups to measure the four major constructs underpinning the CATS. These reflected Teasing about: a) Physical Appearance (n=18)), b) Personality & Behavior (n=17), c) Family & Environment (n=17), and d) School (n=18).

Methods: The instrument was designed, pilot-tested, and then administered to 6-8th grade students.

Findings: The Cronbach's alpha internal consistency reliability, computed on the 70-items CATS, was .95. Only items with item-total correlations > .50 were retained for subsequent analyses. The 34 retained CATS items were subjected to principal components analysis with varimax rotation and Kaiser normalization. Eight initial factors with eigenvalues > 1 emerged, accounting for 65.2% of variance. A four-factor solution was then specified and accounted for 51.2% of variance. Factor 1, Personality & Behavior Teasing (14 items; Cronbach's alpha, .91), explained 18.4% of variance; Factor 2, School-Related Teasing (9 items; Cronbach's alpha, .84); explained 12.4%; Factor 3, Family & Environment Teasing (7 items; Cronbach's alpha, .84) accounted for 11.8% of variance; and Factor 4, Physical Size Teasing (2 items, Cronbach's alpha, .85) accounted for 8.6% of variance.

Conclusions & Implications: The 34 items CATS subscales demonstrated sufficient internal consistency reliability and construct (factorial) validity for use in subsequent research with middle-school children.

Back to Development of the CATS: Child-Adolescent Teasing Scale
Back to 37th Biennial Convention - Scientific Session
Sigma Theta Tau International