Monday, November 3, 2003

This presentation is part of : Assisting People with a Persistent Mental Illness

Mental Health and Housing: Challenging Myths

Cheryl Forchuk, RN, PhD, School of Nursing/Research, University of Western Ontario/Lawson Health Reserach Institute, London, ON, Canada, Catherine A. Ward-Griffin, RN, MScN, PhD, School of Nursing, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada, Mark Speechley, PhD, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada, Rick Csiernik, MSW, PhD, RSW, School of Social Work, Kings College, London, ON, Canada, George Brent Hall, PhD, Environmental Studies, School of Planning, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada, Elsabeth Jensen, RN, MScN, Research, University of Western Ontario/ Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada, Geoff Nelson, PhD, Psychology, Wilfred Laurier University, Waterloo, ON, Canada, and Susan Ouseley, MEd, Can-Voice, London, ON, Canada.
Learning Objective #1: Identify and explore common myths about mental illness, compared to realities, based on a community sample of psychiatric consumer/survivors
Learning Objective #2: Create an awareness of the issues of stigma and discrimination among health professionals

Objective: To identify and explore common myths about mental illness, compared to realities, based on a community sample of psychiatric consumer/survivors. Design: This Community-University Research Alliance (CURA) has used a participatory action research design, incorporating qualitative and quantitative measures to facilitate a capacity building, community-development approach in addressing issues of mental health and housing. Population, Sample, Setting: The qualitative data came from 213 individuals participating in 24 focus groups. Participants either experienced a mental illness themselves, or had family members with mental illness. The quantitative component came from a stratified (by housing type) community sample of 300 individuals diagnosed with a psychiatric problem. Concept or Variables Studied: Issues pertinent to mental health and housing were explored from Consumer and Family perspectives. Demographic measures, quality of life, severity of illness, housing preference, housing histories, and costs to health/social services were among data collected. This report focuses on results related to common myths of mental illness. Methods: Focus groups were used to elicit qualitative data and an ethnographic method of analysis was employed. Structured interviews were used for quantitative data collection. This segment of the project used primarily descriptive and correlational statistics. Findings: Focus group data validated that common misconceptions about mental illness create barriers to successful community-living for consumer/survivors in numerous ways, such as influencing housing, employment, accessing supports, and quality of life. Quantitative queries revealed data, which proved contradictory to a number of misconceptions the public holds about mental illness. Conclusions: This investigation shows many common myths the public holds regarding mental illness are unsupported. Implications: Nurses will benefit from understanding such issues, and may apply this knowledge in working toward improved outcomes for this population. Reducing the influence of stigma and educating the public to realities, in light of such myths, will enhance quality of life across multiple domains.

Back to Assisting People with a Persistent Mental Illness
Back to 37th Biennial Convention - Scientific Session
Sigma Theta Tau International