Paper
Monday, November 14, 2005
This presentation is part of : Interventions to Care for the Older Adult
Reminiscence Functions: Comparing Ethnicity, Gender, Age, Education, Health Status and Personality in Older Adults
Gail Terry Washington, DNS, RN, School of Nursing, Cal State University, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Learning Objective #1: Identify several reminiscence functions associated with older adults
Learning Objective #2: Discuss differences between reminiscence functions associated with older adults

Purpose: To compare the functions of reminiscence in African American, Hispanic American and Caucasian older adult community residents using Washington's Conceptual Framework and Modified Reminiscence Functions Scale.

Design and Methods: The comparative design used a convenient sample of 261 older adults with ethnicity as a stratifying variable. The Modified Reminiscence Functions Scale containing 7 subscales: self-regard, death preparation, bitterness revival, intimacy, teach/inform, boredom, conversation and 39-items, was used to determine for what purpose individuals reminisce (Washington, 2003). In addition to ethnicity, demographic data included: age, years of education, health status, and personality. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used to determine differences in reminiscence functions among gender, ethnic, health status and personality subgroups and Scheffe post-hoc comparisons were performed to determine which pairs of scores were significantly different.

Results: Females and African Americans were slightly more represented (62.8% and 34.5 % respectively). Results indicated significant ethnic differences across subscales (F (3,257) = 9.49, p < 00.1). Scheffle post-hoc test indicated Caucasians were significantly different in their responses than African Americans and Hispanics (F(21,753)=3.101, p < .001. Hispanics were different than African Americans and Caucasians with “death preparation” and Bitterness revival” (F(1,558) = 5.32, p < .001 and (F( 1,368) = 5.56, p < .001 respectively. African Americans were significantly different from Caucasians and Hispanics (F(2,690) = 8.36, p < .000 on “teach/inform”. And, Caucasians were significantly different than African Americans and Hispanics for “boredom reduction” (F(1,893) = 6.56, p < .000. No significant gender, age, education, health status, or personality differences were found across subscales.

Conclusion: The results indicated an assessment be used to identify those persons who may or may not benefit from the use of reminiscence as a therapeutic intervention. Moreover, the study should be replicated in different regions of the country to validate similar findings.