Learning Objective 1: The learner will be able to understand priorities in improvement science research.
Learning Objective 2: The learner will be able to understand the RAND Delphi process for consensus building.
Methods/Subjects: Multiple data sources contributed to the selection of priorities for the national research agenda. A national web-based survey was conducted with almost 3,000 stakeholders in quality and patient safety (response n=560). An environmental scan of existing research priorities in this scientific field was conducted. Using these data, a consensus-building meeting was held with academic and practice scholars and leaders to determine the priorities for the national research agenda.
Results: Response to the ISRN survey was deemed as representative of the targeted interprofessional group thought to be leaders in improvement studies. The expert panel deliberations led to development of a national improvement science research agenda. Priorities are focused on Coordination and Transitions of Care, High-Performing Clinical Systems and Microsystems Approaches to Improvement, Integration of Best Practices into Care, and Learning Organizations and Culture of Quality and Safety.
Conclusions: This represents the first national agenda for the study of improvement strategies. The ISRN is seeking partnerships with academicians and clinicians in acute-care settings to collaborate in improvement studies. The ISRN research agenda informs the selection of a demonstration project to test the infrastructure for implementing multi-site studies. The results of this multi-site research will advance knowledge translation and ultimately inform policy decisions related to quality improvement.
See more of: Oral Paper & Posters