Methods: The CNSAS evolved over several semesters and iterations with the involvement of faculty, students, and community partners. The initial items arose from analyses of student focus groups, reflective journals, and end of program surveys. A subsequent IRB approved study convened 15 faculty, 15 community partners, and 48 students in focus groups to validate survey items. The CNSAS consists of 39 items, measured on a 5 point Likert scale, to assess student experience within the six domains of 1) health promotion and education, 2) knowledge of community, 3) partnering and collaboration, 4) ecological perspective, and 5) self-efficacy. A convenience sample of graduating senior students (n=191) were invited to complete the survey and share narrative reflections on their community experience.
Results: The CNSAS demonstrates high internal consistency (α = 0.986) with each sub-scale yielding strong reliability (α = 0.933 - 0.963). Deductive content analysis of student narratives (n=167) supported validity of survey items.
Conclusion: The CNSAS has application for research and education, particularly for programs seeking to develop and/or refine an emphasis on community engagement. A participatory approach can be applied to any curricular evaluation process.