Methods: Using a community-based randomized control design with delayed intervention, we have recruited and enrolled 250 KAI (130 in intervention group, 120 in control group) with following eligibility criteria: (a) Age between 35 and 80; (b) having the type 2 DM, (c) being able to read Korean; (d) being at high risk of DM as measured by hemoglobin A1c at 7.0 or above; and (e) being able to stay in the program for at least a year. By providing our intervention to every participant (with different timeframes), we can be sensitive to the community’s reasonable concern: not to use vulnerable immigrants with limited resources as research subjects without giving them any direct benefit. The 3 interventions were 6 week-long education on DM management focusing on comprehensive self-care skills including health literacy, followed by telephone counseling and home glucose monitoring for 12 months. Main outcomes were measured at baseline, 3, 6, 9, 12 months.
Results: Among 250 enrolled, 209 (mean age, 58.9 ± 8.4 years) completed the 12 month–long follow-up data collection; 105 in the intervention and 104 in the control group. The majority of these participants were married (89%); the average length of stay in US was 23 years, and the majority had at least high school education at their home land. The average monthly income was $4,269 and 52% did not have any access to health care.
Evaluation of the primary end point, the level of HgA1c reveled significant between differences at each measurement point. (Table 1).
GroupPeriod |
Baseline |
Month 3 |
Month 6 |
Month 9 |
Month 12 |
Intervention (A) |
8.9 (1.95) |
7.9 (1.50) |
7.7 (1.44) |
7.7 (1.46) |
7.6 (1.17) |
Usual Care (B) |
8.7 (1.58) |
8.4 (1.55) |
8.3 (1.49) |
8.2 (1.48) |
8.1 (1.41) |
Diff (A-B) |
0.2 |
-0.5 |
-0.6 |
-0.5 |
-0.5 |
Prob(A-B) ≠ 0 |
0.31 |
0.01 |
0.00 |
0.02 |
0.01 |
Significant changes were observed over time in some psycho-behavioral outcomes, including self-efficacy for DM control, medication adherence behavior, DM related health literacy, diet pattern (p < 0.05). In addition, the intervention and control group showed a significant difference in DM knowledge and the level of depression.
Conclusion: The study findings highlighted the importance of placing systematic efforts to developing tailored intervention to address the unique need of a target cultural group. While the methodological discussion regarding the effectiveness of the intervention of this kind is limited, especially in ethnic minority groups, we strongly believe that the systematic strategies and methodologies we used in this study are transferrable to other underserved communities. More importantly, lessons learned from our community-based trial using CBPR principles and community partners will be shared in the context of addressing the sustainability issue of this kind of program.
See more of: Research Sessions: Oral Paper & Posters