Methods: Mixed methods was used to examine the role of leaders in the academic setting in creating a positive context and work experience for followers. Data was collected using pre post-test analysis; and, followers were asked to provide qualitative reasons for their answers and to give their solutions to problems. A focus group was convened to validate the finding at post-test.
Results: Data at post-test indicated a negative trend suggesting that the perceptions of follower of their leaders had not improved from time of pre-test. Qualitative analysis revealed the themes of nepotism, favouritism, information provision to favouritism and lack of consultation to be the main ways of leadership control and follower focus.
Conclusion:
Harmful leadership results when positive leadership strategies are combined with the potential of leaders to pursue personal agendas, including pursuing and abusing power, developing a sense of self-importance, using fear, and creating a sense of isolation through alienation.
See more of: Research Sessions: Oral Paper & Posters