Methods: We used a cross-sectional study design, guided by the Biopsychosocial Model of Risk Taking. Girls completed a computerized battery of cognitive function tests, including the Information Sampling Task (IST), the Stockings of Cambridge (SOC), Cambridge Gambling Task (CGT), and the Affective Go/No-Go (AGN) and demographic, psychosocial and SRB-related surveys. Scores >1 on a SRB index (0-6) indicated high SRB. Bivariate correlations, analysis of variance and regression statistics were calculated using SPSS(R) statistical software package version 22.
Results: Mean age was 17.8±1.9 years. Mean age at sexual debut was 15.5±2.6. Girls with high SRB (vs low SRB) were/had significantly: older (18.6 vs 16.9) and greater mean: depression (11.58 vs 7.26), disinhibition (4.29 vs 2.77) and lower mean: coping (165.14 vs 177.73) and accuracy on IST (poorer impulse control) (6.43 vs 7.38). Higher SRB scores were significantly (p<.05) associated with higher: age (r= .41), disinhibition (r=.34), depression (r=.33), boredom susceptibility (r=.27) scores and poorer/lower: coping (r=−.26), seeking spiritual support (r=−.29) and impulse control: IST sampling errors (r=.30), IST total correct (r=−.30), IST mean # boxes opened/trial (r=−.32). Girls with higher disinhibition were more likely to have higher SRB [Exp(B)=3.08, p=.09], while accounting for covariates (all non-significant). Greater disinhibition was also (Beta= .47, p=.001) associated with higher SRB index scores in a model accounting for 58.7% variance (R2=.587), beyond covariates (non-significant).
Conclusion: Higher SRB is associated with disinhibition and poorer impulse control in our sample of Black girls. Those interested in helping AA girls to minimize their SRB should provide tailored HIV/STI prevention efforts based on important links between psychosocial factors, including disinhibition, and impulse control. Findings can be used to facilitate future imaging, longitudinal and intervention studies.
References:
1. Donahue, K., Van Hulle, C., Rodgers, J. L., & D'Onofrio, B. M. (2014). Psychosocial Predictors of Adolescent Sexual Risk Behavior: A Quasi-Experimental Analysis in a Nationally Representative Sample of American Youths. Journal of Adolescent Health, 54(2 Supplement), S15-S16.
2. Steinberg, L. (2010). A dual systems model of adolescent risk‐taking. Developmental psychobiology, 52(3), 216-224.
3. Danielson, C. K., Walsh, K., McCauley, J., Ruggiero, K. J., Brown, J. L., Sales, J. M., Rose, E., Wingood, G., & DiClemente, R. J. (2014). HIV-Related Sexual Risk Behavior Among African American Adolescent Girls. Journal of Women's Health, 23(5), 413-419.
4. Smith, A., Chein, J., & Steinberg, L. (2013). Impact of socio-emotional context, brain development, and pubertal maturation on adolescent decision-making. Hormones and Behavior, 64, 323-332.
5. Shulman, E., Harden, K., Chein, J., & Steinberg, L. (2014). The development of impulse control and sensation-seeking in adolescence: Independent or interdependent processes? Journal of Research on Adolescence. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1111/jora.12181
6. Steinberg, L. (2014). Age of opportunity: Lessons from the new science of adolescence. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt