Methods: This study will use a comparative descriptive design. The charts of all patients diagnosed with sepsis will be evaluated during the six-month period from January 2014 to July 2014 prior to implementation of a MEWS tool with SIRS criteria and the charts of all patients diagnosed with sepsis from August 2014 to January 2015 after implementation of a MEWS tool with SIRS criteria will be evaluated. The research questions for this study are: 1) Is there a difference in mortality in sepsis patients scored using a MEWS tool as compared to sepsis patients who did not use the MEWS assessment tool? 2) Is there a difference in length of stay for septic patients post MEWS implementation? 3) Does use of MEWS tool decrease cost to treat septic patients? Descriptive statistics will be collected and reported on the mortality rates, length of stay, and cost to treat in both groups. A Chi-square test, alpha 0.05, will be used to determine if a proportional difference exists between the groups for each of the study variables.
Results: Data collection for this project is in progress.
Conclusion: Early warning systems facilitate identification of all at-risk patients. Nurses accurately identifying and regularly assessing patient vital signs, laboratory data, and other physiological findings are essential to a successful sepsis recognition tool. The researcher expects to find a MEWS tool which incorporates SIRS criteria will be effective in identifying adult hospitalized patients at-risk for clinical decline from sepsis and will decrease mortality, length of stay, and cost to treat.
See more of: Invited Posters