Methods: Secondary data was coded from the 2013 and 2014 Stanford Nepal Medical Project medical camp health assessments (n= 624). Results were processed with REDCap for prevalence of chief complaints and other assessment data. Data were then compared to publicly accessible data about Nepal.
Results: Two prevalence measurements were taken using the secondary data: chief complaints and health assessments based on the medical diagnoses. Leading categories for seeking treatment locally and nationally overlapped: digestive (19% locally v. 11.4% nationally), respiratory (5% v. 7.7%), skin (15% v. 2.7%). Locally, eye problems were the 5th leading complaint (11%) yet unlisted among national and international reports. The local assessment data further diverged: eye (13.06%), musculoskeletal (12.76%), cardiovascular (10.39%), skin (10.09%) and digestive problems (9.49%) were most common. National and international assessments list digestive (11.2% national, 18% international) and respiratory (7%, 12.7%) problems as the top two assessments. The findings suggest there may be a significant urban-rural disparity in health problems.
Conclusion: The study’ results demonstrate that these rural Nepali communities are not only underserved for basic health needs but that services may not match with patient reported problems. Similar rural communities remain unassessed with potential discordant health needs. Accurate assessment data for isolated communities can match supply and demand to drive efficient mobilization of limited resources to improve health outcomes. Nurses could be used to address the majority of problems found in theses communities.