Aims: The objective of this analysis was to examine ethical issues in research with children and adolescents from their perspective as participants, including: assent, parental consent, risk perception, impact of research participation, and incentives.
Methods: This systematic review was conducted per the Long et al. framework by means of an iterative searching process. Using the key words ‘research ethics’ and ‘child or pediatric or adolescent’, PubMed, CINAHL, and EBSCOhost databases were searched to identify articles. Limitations placed on the original searches were: English language, year of publication between 2003–2014, humans, abstract available, and age birth–18 years.
Findings: Twenty-three empiric studies were identified and formed the sample. Included studies represented a diverse range of areas of research, methods, settings, sample demographics, authors, and journals.
Discussion: Even young children demonstrated the ability to understand essential elements of research, although there is variability in children’s level of understanding. Trust was a significant contributing factor to children’s and adolescents’ participation in research, and also shaped their assessments of risk. Research participation was mainly beneficial for children and adolescents. Incentives were mainly viewed positively, although concerns of possible undue influence were expressed.
Conclusions: This systematic review highlights the importance of including the perspectives of children and adolescents and provides researchers and nurse clinicians with best practices for involving children in research.
Key conclusions included that:
- Assent processes and instruments need to be created with the assistance of child development specialists and piloted with children before being used.
- A priori consultation with representative adolescents and parents can provide guidance for developing consent and assent procedures within challenging contexts.
- All research with children and adolescents could benefit from inclusion of a short, formative, off-study interview or survey with participants to gauge their experience in the study.
- An important gap in the literature is consideration of whether children and adolescents, beyond simply understanding their research rights, are capable of applying this knowledge and of actually exerting their research rights.
See more of: Invited Posters