Methods: To address this goal, this study examined study design frameworks using a scoping review methodology with the following steps: the identification of the domains of the health care system that must be explored; search and selection of relevant studies; charting the studies’ findings; and summarization of the results.
Results: Study design frameworks for cross-country comparisons of health care outcomes within the health system context varied by: (1) use of country selection criteria as a basis for country selection, (2) use of a guiding theory to govern the elements for comparison, (3) the decision of the data type (i.e., quantitative, qualitative, mixed-methods), (4) ascertainment and validation of measurements, (5) synthesis of findings employed a wide versus narrow focus, (6) inclusion of countries' cultures and population composition, and (7) contribution to other countries' health systems.
Conclusion: A grid denoting a variety of cross-country study design frameworks depicts a variety of strengths and weaknesses. Countries' health care systems are culturally-linked, but criteria exploring or explicating cultural influences within the health system context were sparse or absent. Moreover, cross-country comparison frameworks were inconsistent in their abilities to delineate and define approaches that resulted in inequitable health service outcomes for different population groups. Design frameworks failing to include the cultural context limit our ability to fully examine differences in health care outcomes. Nurses and other health professionals must choose a study design framework that is systematic, comprehensive and sufficiently robust to meet the challenge of conducting cross-country comparisons so that study results are able to assist countries' policymakers and administrators to make improvements that promote better and more equitable health outcomes for their population.