Implementation of a Diabetes Self-Management Intervention for Mexican-American Families in the Arizona-Mexico Border Region

Saturday, 29 July 2017: 1:50 PM

Marylyn M. McEwen, PhD, RN, FAAN
College of Nursing and Mel & Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA

Background: The 50 million Hispanics who represent 16% of the U.S. population are disproportionately affected by diabetes (12.8%) when compared to non-Hispanic Caucasians (7.6%). The chronic and complex trajectory of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) requires daily engagement in self-management activities and occurs in a family environment. Diabetes self-management education and support (DSME/SS) builds knowledge, skills and abilities for successful T2DM self-management, decreases A1C and weight, reduces A1C by 1%, has a positive effect on other clinical indicators and health care costs. But, there is a paucity of evidenced-based lifestyle modification programs tailored to Hispanic culture and integrate family members into the intervention. We report on the refinement and testing of a 3-month culturally tailored family-based T2DM DSME/SS intervention on behavioral and biological outcomes.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to refine, expand (Phase I), test and evaluate the effectiveness of a culturally tailored family-based intervention to improve behavioral and biological outcomes for Hispanic adults with T2DM and their family members (Phase II).

Methods: In Phase I we used a CBPR approach to engage a Family Action Board (FAB) (n=24) to refine and expand a culturally tailored individual-based T2DM DSME/SS intervention to a family-based intervention. In Phase II we used a randomized, two group experimental design, participants with T2DM and a family member (n=87 dyads) completed questionnaires, biological measurements, immediately following intervention, and at 6 months post intervention.

Results: The FAB participated in intervention revision, improving the reach of the family level intervention. Participants with T2DM ranged in age from 38 to 73 (M=54, SD=9); family members from 18 to 88 (mean=48, SD=16), most had less than a high school education (73% participant; 53% family member), family income was $20,000 or less (69% participant; 58% family member). Participants had significant intervention effects for total self-management activities (p=.001), total self-efficacy (p=.003), and total diabetes distress (p<.001) with self-management and self-efficacy being sustained for 6 months. Family members had significant intervention effects for total family self-efficacy (p=.016), pedometer steps (p=.016), and pedometer miles (p=.008) with family self-efficacy being sustained for 6 months.

Conclusions: We are in the second translational research phase. We used CBPR to improve the reach of the study and promotoras and a diabetes educator to improve intervention effectiveness. Further research is required to strengthen the impact of the intervention on targeted outcomes before dissemination and adoption of the intervention can occur.