Because of the significant morbidity that patients face subsequent to the onset of this syndrome, a study was designed to better understand the patient’s experience related to this illness. The stated purpose of the study was to gain a richer understanding of the patient’s recalled experience of an acute episode of moderate to severe Guillain-Barre’ syndrome.
Methods: The study utilized a qualitative descriptive research design with inductive content analysis. Criteria for inclusion in the study were: (a) adult patients 18 years of age and older, (b) individuals with a prior self-identified diagnosis of moderate to severe Guillain-Barre syndrome, (c) individuals who were alert and oriented, (d) individuals able to respond to interview questions, (e) individuals with English as a primary or secondary language, and (f) those who were able to give informed consent.
Results: Fourteen individuals were interviewed about their experience with moderate to severe Guillain-Barre’ syndrome. These participants were from 8 states representing primarily states located within the southeastern part of the United States. Seventy one point four percent of the participants were female and 28.6% were male. All of the participants were hospitalized ranging from 5 days to 405 days. Three research questions were addressed through description of five themes and 14 subthemes. This presentation will focus on one of the themes. The theme of focus revealed the value expressed by participants related to contact with a peer who had been impacted with the same illness. There is additional evidence to suggest that patients find value in talking with peers who share a similar illness experience (Doyle, 2015). Having contact with a peer provided hope about what the future may hold including the potential for recovery. Participants described that information shared by someone who had experienced the illness was perceived as being more impactful than information shared by healthcare professionals. Information from individuals impacted with the illness was considered more impactful because it created reassurance that recovery was possible. Information from peers was also seen as being more credible than information from professional caregivers.
Conclusions: Additional research is needed with more individuals impacted with rare illnesses focusing on the value of peer support/peer counseling. It is important for patients diagnosed with Guillain-Barre’ syndrome to be linked to the GBS/CIDP Foundation so that peer counselors can be linked if so desired by the individual impacted by this rare neurological illness.
See more of: Research Sessions: Oral Paper & Posters