Methods: A total of 204 individuals completed questionnaires to measure health status and subjective decline in executive function and neuropsychological tests to assess objective executive functioning. To assess self-rated health the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of the EuroQol was used. Participants were asked to rate their current general health on the VAS ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health status) to 100 (best imaginable health status). The subjective executive function was measured with the Attention-Fatigue Index (AFI). Each item is rated from 0 (not at all) to 10 (extremely well or a great deal) on a numeric rating scale. An average of 13 items yields a total score, with higher scores indicating better executive functioning. To examine the relationship between objective and subjective executive function and self-rated health, multiple regression analyses were conducted after adjusting for covariates (i.e., age, gender, education level, and depressive symptoms).
Results: Objective and subjective executive functions predicted self-rated health after adjusting for covariates (standardized βs 0.255, 0.314, respectively). About 25% of the variances of self-rated health were explained by objective and subjective executive functions.
Conclusion: We found that executive function is an important factor influencing individual perception of health. It is also noted that self-report of cognitive decline is also associated with self-rated health along with objectively measured cognitive function. This finding suggests the potential value of subjective cognitive function complaints of individuals, which can be easily measured, to prevent poor health status.