Community Genogram: An Innovation to Guide Health Promotion and Risk Reduction Interventions in Rural Thailand

Sunday, 22 July 2018: 10:35 AM

Naruemol Singha-Dong, PhD1
April Bigelow, PhD2
Michelle Pardee, DNP3
Sornchai Thanjaroen, SN4
Sataporn Danrabiab, SN4
Orathai Chapthaisong, SN4
Supamas Khammoon, SN4
Somrutai Tochaiyaphum, SN4
Wijitra Sanudchai, SN4
Pornsiri Kruadsungnoen, SN4
Rattanapon Ramhan, SN4
(1)Institute of Nursing, School of Community Health Nursing, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand
(2)Department of Health Behavior and Biological Sciences, University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
(3)University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
(4)School of Community Health Nursing, Institute of Nursing, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand

INTRODUCTION:

Chronic non-communicable diseases (NCD) such as heart disease, stroke, cancer, chronic respiratory diseases, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus are the most significant causes of death globally where 80% of chronic disease mortality occurs in low and middle income countries (World Health Organization, 2011) including Thailand (Benjarak, Krobmai, Naraongat, Ruksakulpiwat, & Singha-Dong, 2016; Ministry of Public Health, 2016).

In rural Thailand, patients have limited health literacy and limited points of contact with providers within the health care system further underscoring the need for prevention efforts and access to local educational sessions. Local sub-district health promotion hospitals are well positioned to deliver educational sessions to rural Thai villagers, but often retroactive, individual-based, lack resources and validated programs. Understanding community dynamics, relationship, and wellbeing is very important to community nurses to guide health promotion and risk reduction interventions in such setting.

The purpose of this study was expand on previous work that evaluated a family genogram that was initiated to prevent stroke and improve patient outcomes in a high-risk, underserved population in a rural community of Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand. This study aims to evaluate the usefulness of the genogram for its capacity to serve as an aid to better understand family structure and dynamics at a community level and guide health promotion and risk reduction interventions in rural close-knit communities of Chok Chai District in Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand.

METHOD:

Community leaders and lay health volunteers were contacted and informed regarding purpose, strength, and limitation of genogram application. Upon agreement, residents were informed and invited to provide family information household by household. Residents were interviewed at their houses or community hall. The composition of each household was recorded using a genogram. Details of family illness, housing, and occupation were noted. Age, medical history, health status, risk behaviors, and causes of morbidity and mortality of individual member were taken. Every individual older than 15 years old was screened for diabetes, hypertension, stroke risks, and risk factors for coronary heart disease. Family genograms of at least five generations were grouped into community genogram starting with the family with the largest members identified by community and families with frequently found NCD burden. Community genogram was analyzed for health needs and findings were presented and discussed with community leaders and members through community forum. Health promotion and risk reduction interventions were proposed, discussed, and agreed by the forum and implemented for a duration of four weeks. Data were analyzed using descriptive, comparative, and inferential statistics.

RESULTS:

Meeting residents proactively was an effective and apparently efficient way of providing basic screening and plan for intervention. It allowed nurses to learn about the structure of families, the social problems faced by their community, and the areas in which their health care could be improved. Visualizing risks through community genogram increased family and community awareness regarding NCD as well as other illnesses. The genogram facilitated the identification of key resource persons for disease control and prevention. Moreover, the community genogram increased community engagement and participation in health promotion and risk reduction interventions. More than half of those at NCD risk voluntarily participated in multiple interventions tailored to their needs. The interventions resulted in significant improvements in knowledge, risk reduction skills, lifestyle, and clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSION:

The community genogram is a graphic tool that places emphasis on the positive strengths and resources that can be used to guide health promotion and risk reduction interventions. This application of community genogram provides a model which could be adapted with other disadvantage or 'hard-to-reach' communities to improve health and wellbeing of their population.