Methods: After institutional approval, we recruited participants through social media. Via a quantitative cross-sectional comparative design, we constructed demographic questions about disaster training for participants and then administered (with permission from American Nurses Credentialing Center [ANCC]) the National Healthcare Disaster Exam to further assess participants’ disaster relief knowledge.
Results: Demographically, most participants reported no training in active shooter scenarios, providing care without power or in mass casualties, fire drills, tornado drills, bomb threats, or floods. Chi-square tests of independence were conducted between age, disaster experience, education level, nursing role, and military experience and analyzed with responses to disaster preparation questions. No statistically significant associations presented among any categories and disaster preparation questions, with the exception of disaster experience and knowledge of health consequences (x2[3]=9.561, p= 0.031), disaster experiences and knowledge of medical countermeasures (x2[3] = 9.561, p = 0.023), and age and knowledge of individual health consequences (x2[3] = 2.345, p = 0.039).
Even in participants who reported having disaster experience, that experience was only associated with significantly different responses to two test questions. In the absence of disaster experience, most people reported almost zero preparation; even having military experience did not significantly affect results. Our hypothesis was correct; disaster curriculum in nursing school is non-existent and does not prepare nurses for disaster scenarios in the workplace.
Conclusion: Based on our review of the literature, these results fill critical gaps in nurses' overall disaster healthcare knowledge. Nursing programs lack curricula to prepare nurses for the physical and mental care of disaster victims. According to the National Center for Victims of Crime, the number of mass shootings occurring in the past ten years is 2.4x greater than the decade prior (1998 to 2007) with more than half (57%) of all recorded mass shootings having occurred within the past 10 years (National Criminal Justice Reference Service, 2018). In 2016 and 2017 alone, 50 mass-killing incidents (20 in 2016, 30 in 2017) resulted in 943 casualties (221 people killed and 722 people wounded, excluding the shooters) (U.S. Department of Justice [DOJ], Federal Bureau of Investigation [FBI], 2018). On October 27th, 2018, an active-shooter stormed into the Tree of Life Congregation Synagogue in Pittsburgh's Squirrel Hill neighborhood shouting hate for Jews and killing worshipers. Eleven people were killed, two other worshipers were injured, and four officers also were injured (Hafner and Meley, 2018). Disaster preparedness is vital for nurses to respond to these threats. Current literature suggests there is a gap in knowledge concerning disaster preparedness in natural and man-made disaster education in nursing curriculum (Jose and Dufrene, 2014).
Implications of our findings include evidence supporting the incorporation of innovative pedagogy within nursing education. Life-saving disaster preparedness knowledge may be implemented into nursing curriculum through discussion of disaster scenarios and adding disaster preparedness lecture materials. Furthermore, recognizing that graduating nurses need stronger skills in disaster nursing, disaster simulations may be implemented into curriculum (Rafferty-Semon, Jarzembak, and Shanholtzer, 2017). At least one person in nursing faculty should be responsible for disaster preparedness education for their respective school of nursing. This person should be nationally certified by an accredited program. Interprofessional and interagency collaboration is likely required to implement these programs and education. This study may bring about potentially paradigm shifting educational initiatives to better our future nurses.