Methods: Prior to participating in the three simulations students were segregated into teams of six or seven members. Each team provided care to a multi-trauma client, a intensive care client, and a client experiencing cardiac arrest. Student outcomes were evaluated after each scenario with the Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning survey (NLN, 2005). The three simulations integrate skills and equipment routinely used in the critical care and emergency department settings. The scenarios were developed from the recommendations of the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) (Dellinger et al., 2012), the Association of Critical Care Nurses (ACCN) (Bell, 2015), Emergency Nurse Association (Moore, K. 2012), the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) (Greenberg et al., 2016), and the American Heart Association (AHA) (Morrison, et al., 2013).
Results: Student outcomes were evaluated after each scenario with the Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning survey (NLN, 2005). Students (N=311) reported increased confidence in critical thinking ability (91%), decision-making skills (87%), assessment skills (88%), and ability to recognize and respond to significant changes in clinical condition (>90%). Students also reported increased knowledge of the conditions presented in the scenarios (90%). Overall students felt more comfortable with providing care to clients in the critical care setting (>86%).
Conclusion: Students reported increased confidence and comfort with providing care to clients with complex clinical problems. Students also reported less anxiety and felt more prepared for clinical rotations in critical care clinical settings and other complex clinical settings. Additionally, students reported high levels of satisfaction with role modeling and simulation as an instructional strategy. The results of this study can be used by nurse educators to improve instruction of students and training of nurses in complex clinical settings.