Saturday, July 12, 2003

This presentation is part of : Substance Abuse

Genetic and Environmental Influences on Symptoms of Problematic Involvement with Alcohol and Smoking Behaviors in Twins from the MIDUS Survey

Thomas Hardie, EdD, RN, CS, NP, Associate Professor1, Howard Moss, MD, Professor2, Kevin Lynch, PhD, Assistant Professor2, and Caryn Lerman, PhD, Professor3. (1) Department of Nursing, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA, (2) Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennslyvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA, (3) School of Medicine TTURC, University of Pennslyvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Learning Objective #1: Understand the use of the Biometrical method to determine the influence of genetic, shared and unshared environments in complex behaviors
Learning Objective #2: Identify symptoms of alcohol dependence and smoking behaviors with genetic liability and their implications for treatment and research

Objective: To quantify the contributions of genetic and environmental factors to symptoms of problematic involvement with alcohol and smoking behaviors. Design: Biometrical methods were used to analyze responses to alcohol and smoking-related survey questions from MZ/DZ twins. Data were analyzed to determine contributions of genetic, shared and unshared environmental factors to these behaviors. Sample: The sample included 998 twin pairs from the Midlife Development in the US (MIDUS) study. Respondents were a nationally representative sample of adults(25-74yrs). Findings: Biometrical analyses of alcohol problem symptoms indicated that genetics accounted for a sizable proportion of variance, with a heritability of 63% for “increased chances of harm from drinking”, a heritability of 51% for “drinking larger/longer than intended” and a heritability of 48% for “being under the effects/after effects of alcohol at work, school or while caring for children”. “Desire to use” and “emotional problems” were accountable only on the basis of environment factors. Results for smoking indicated a heritability of 76% for having “ever smoked on a regular basis”. Similarly, the heritability for “current regular smoking” was 73%. However, for “making a quit attempt” 99% of the variance was due to the environment, with no genetic influence. Conclusion: The findings demonstrate the etiological heterogeneity of symptoms of problematic alcohol involvement. Depending on the symptom, genetic and environmental factors differentially combine. For cigarette smoking, the analyses confirm and extend previous reports of the heritability of smoking behavior as approximately 70%. While these findings suggest the importance of genetic factors in smoking behavior, they also demonstrate the importance of environmental factors in attempts smoking cessation. Thus, clinical interventions, and public health efforts can have potentially potent effects on problematic involvement with alcohol and cigarette smoking through appropriate etiological targeting. This research was supported, in part, by at TTURC Grant from NCI and NIDA P5084718.

Back to Substance Abuse
Back to 14th International Nursing Research Congress
Sigma Theta Tau International
10-12 July 2003