Friday, July 11, 2003

This presentation is part of : Populations at Risk Continued

Dimensions of Violence in Patients Hospitalized for Gunshot Wound in Trauma Centers in Cape Town, South Africa

Kathryn G. Sapnas, PhD, RN, CCRN, CNOR, Nurse II1, Andy Nicol, MD, Head of Trauma2, and Delawir Kahn, MD, MchB, Professor2. (1) Division of Surgical Nursing, University of Miami/Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, FL, USA, (2) Div. of Surgery, University of Cape Town, Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa
Learning Objective #1: Describe the dimensions of violence related attitudes and behaviors in patients admitted to trauma centers in Cape Town, South Africa
Learning Objective #2: Identify a psychometrically sound cross-cultural screening tool that identifies violence related attitudes and behaviors

Objective: To gain an in-depth understanding of the dimensions of violence: context, circumstances, and motivations that occur in patients admitted to the hospital with firearm injuries and test the psychometric properties of the Attitudes Towards Guns and Violence Questionnaire AGVQ© (Shapiro et al., 1997).

Design: Prospective hospital-based study using survey research methods.

Sample: Cohort of patients (N= 138) admitted to Trauma Centers in Cape Town, South Africa admitted for gunshot wound(s).

Methods: Structured bedside interviews were conducted. Two instruments were interviewer administered. provided a respondent profile. The 23-item Attitudes Towards Guns and Violence Questionnaire AGVQ© (Shapiro et al., 1997) (Cronbach a =.88) was used to assess the dimensions of violence.

Findings: The respondents were predominantly male (n=118; 86%), 18-29 years (n=88; 64%), single (n=90;65%), had not completed high school and were unemployed (n=75; 54%). Twenty-five subjects (18%) reported gang membership and 33 (24%) respondents had been shot before. Less than half (n=61; 45%) of the subjects knew who shot them. The AGVQ© original four factor structure was replicated. Four scales with four items each were created. Scale reliability ranged from .71-.81. Factor 1 "Comfort with Aggression" items loaded from .69 to .82; Factor 2 "Power/Safety" items loaded from .71 to.75; Factor 3 "Aggressive Response to Shame" items loaded from .71 to.77; and Factor 4 "Excitement" items loaded from .63-.81.

Conclusions: The characteristics of respondents in this study mirror those of trauma victims in the United States. This study provides evidence that AGVQ© is psychometrically sound in a South African sample. This analysis suggests that the psychological dimensions of attitudes towards guns and violence are common across cultures

Implications: Currently, major injury is a missed opportunity to initiate violence interventions. Findings from this study can assist in the development of tertiary violence prevention programs in trauma centers internationally.

Back to Populations at Risk Continued
Back to 14th International Nursing Research Congress
Sigma Theta Tau International
10-12 July 2003