Thursday, July 10, 2003

This presentation is part of : Research Utilization

More Effective, Less Expensive: Evaluation of an Evidence-Based Regional, Nurse-Led Chronic Wound Service

Margaret B. Harrison, RN, PhD, Senior Scientist, Associate Professor, and Career Scientist1, E. Friedberg, RN, MHA, N/A2, I.D. Graham, PhD, N/A2, and K. Lorimer, RN, MScN, N/A2. (1) School of Nursing, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada, (2) ON, Canada
Learning Objective #1: Understand the pragmatic strategies to evaluate evidence-based clinical and health services changes
Learning Objective #2: Appreciate the scope and level of outcomes required to evaluate the implementation of an evidence-based protocol

Objective: An initiative to deliver ‘best practice’ with chronic wound care was undertaken in one large Canadian community. This involved: evaluating international practice guideline recommendations, developing the local protocol, conducting a prevalence survey and regional needs assessment, assisting the planners with the clinical/organizational redesign for the new service. Design: One-year pre-post evaluation study has been completed from the clinical and health services perspective.

Population, Setting, Years: Chronic wound population, Canadian, urban-rural area of 1,000,000. Home care and Nurse Clinics. Study period 2000-2002. Intervention, Outcome Variables: With the new service, nurses provided care to all clients regionally with chronic leg ulcers referred to home care using an evidenced-based clinical protocol. The service model involved all-RN team of primary and secondary nurses with streamlined links to specialist physicians. The results of the one-year pre-post analysis will be presented comparing clinical, service, and economic outcomes.

Results: We followed 161 clients pre-implementation, and following implementation, 409 clients were admitted with venous, mixed and/or arterial leg ulcers. There were no significant differences between pre- and post-groups in socio-demographic and clinical variables (comorbidities, chronicity, size, location, duration of ulcer). After implementation, significant differences were found in healing rates: 23% healed at 3 months pre- compared with 52% post-implementation. The venous ulcer healing rate was 24% pre-implementation compared with 64% after. Visits per week dropped from 3.2 to 2.4, with the proportion of daily visits decreasing from 44% to 8%. Weekly supply costs decreased from $119 to $48.

Conclusions: Implementation of evidence-based care in the community for the leg population has resulted in more effective, less expensive services. Healing rates at 3 months have more than doubled; scarce nursing time is being utilized more efficiently. Implications: The region is providing care to more people with leg ulcer problems for less cost and with less nursing staff.

Back to Research Utilization
Back to 14th International Nursing Research Congress
Sigma Theta Tau International
10-12 July 2003