Paper
Thursday, July 22, 2004
This presentation is part of : Health Promotion in Children
Evaluation of Community-Based Farm Safety Education for Children
Deborah Reed, PhD, MSPH, RN1, Deborah Claunch, BBA1, Mary Kay Rayens, PhD1, and Debbie Slusher, N/A2. (1) University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA, (2) Farm Safety 4 Just Kids, Earlham, IA, USA
Learning Objective #1: Identify key issues related to safety of children on farms
Learning Objective #2: Describe a community program that effectively teaches children about farm safety

Objective: Annually, 32,800 children are injured on U.S. farms. This study evaluated the effectiveness of Farm Safety 4 Just Kids (FS4JK) day camps in improving knowledge of selected farm safety issues.

Design: Closed cohort, repeated measure survey using a nonrandom sample.

Population: Six camps in five states across the United States were selected for evaluation. Selection was based on the historical involvement in FS4JK day camps, anticipated number of attendees in grades 4 and 5, differences in farm type, and geographic location. All children who attended the selected camps were eligible to participate. Variables studied: Safety knowledge about tractors, animals, and powered equipment.

Method: The investigators designed a 33-item pre- and post-test and administered it to children who attended the camps. Pre-tests were completed the day before the camp; post-tests were completed at the end of the camp day. Adults read the questions aloud to the children to keep them on task and increase comprehension.

Findings: Of the 1,347 children who attended the selected camps, 1,220 (90.6%) completed both the pre- and post-tests. Overall, knowledge increased significantly (p< .05) in each of the three areas evaluated. For the outcomes of animal safety, power equipment safety, and overall safety, the improvement was significantly greater for nonfarm children (n=680), compared with children who lived/worked on farms (n=540). The two groups did not differ on change in tractor safety. After adjusting for baseline safety knowledge, there was no difference between farm and nonfarm campers; however, girls demonstrated greater change than boys.

Conclusions: Farm safety day camps are effective in improving children’s knowledge about farm safety. Implications: Community-led farm safety day camps may be a venue to positively influence children’s knowledge about farm injury risks. Coupled with other programs for parents and farm families, these efforts may reduce the prevalence of child farm injuries.

Back to Health Promotion in Children
Back to 15th International Nursing Research Congress
Sigma Theta Tau International
July 22-24, 2004