Paper
Friday, July 23, 2004
This presentation is part of : Health Promotion Models
Measuring Resilience: Thinking of or Thinking Through the Use of a Quantitative Instrument
Kathleen Tusaie, PhD, RNCS, College of Nursing, College of Nursing, University of Akron, Akron, OH, USA
Learning Objective #1: Describe the use of diagrammatic thinking to establish nomological validity
Learning Objective #2: Understand the significance of identifying theoretical concepts underpinning empirical research

Measuring resilience: Thinking of or thinking through the use of a quantitative instrument

Object/Design: The study of resilience has moved from qualitative exploratory studies and descriptive statistics to model building and quantitative instruments. When applied appropriately, these instruments can provide significant assistance in the expansion of knowledge related to resilience. Although paradigms for new instrument development are well known and accepted, precautions required for “borrowing” instruments must also be considered. Careful attention to the congruence of the conceptual underpinnings of the study and the instrument is the most basic step prior to “borrowing” an instrument. This presentation will provide a method of diagrammatic thinking to link the theoretical/conceptual realm with the observable one.

Population/Sample: The nomological validity of the Resilience Attitude Scale (RAS)(Biscoe & Harris, 1994) was diagrammed and then administered to a small, convenience sample of adult women who were participating in a therapy group for healing from sexual abuse.

Concept/variable: Resilience is the ability to transform adversity into a growth experience. However, there are many inconsistencies and controversies in the literature around defining resilience.

Methods/Findings: The nomological network (Cronbach & Meehl, 1995) was used.There was only partial congruence between the RAS and the conceptual framework of the study.

Conclusions/Implications: To measure resilience, outcome as well as attitudinal measurement was required. Because creating a nomological network requires a specific theoretic pattern, it requires one to think specifically about the concepts underpinning our empirical work. This initial step when considering the use of a “borrowed” instrument holds the potential to add conceptual clarity to the study of resilience.

Learning objectives: 1. Describe the use of diagrammatic thinking to establish nomological validity. 2. Understand the significance of identifying theoretical concepts underpinning empirical research.

Back to Health Promotion Models
Back to 15th International Nursing Research Congress
Sigma Theta Tau International
July 22-24, 2004