Paper
Thursday, July 14, 2005
A Comparison of Ondansetron and Transdermal Scopolamine Patches for Patients Identified to be at High Risk for the Development of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
Joseph Burkard, DNSc, CRNA, Nurse Anesthesia, Naval School of Health Sciences, San Diego, CA, USA
Learning Objective #1: Understand the risk factors associated with nausea and vomiting |
Learning Objective #2: Discuss the different treatment modes for postoperative nausea and vomiting |
Risk factors have been identified which place a patient at a greater risk for developing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). The purpose of this study was to determine if using a combination of TD scopolamine and IV ondansetron would be more efficacious in preventing PONV in a group of patients who are at high risk for PONV when compared to a similar group given IV ondansetron alone. This randomized, double blind trial was performed on 56 ASA I and II patients who were identified as high risk for the development of PONV. Prior to surgery all subjects randomly received either a transdermal scopolamine or placebo patch in addition to intravenous ondansetron. A significant difference was noted between the scopolamine (385 minutes) and the placebo (240 minutes) in the time until they experienced their first episode of nausea (p=0.032) and in the time of first emesis (498 minutes versus 324 minutes, respectively) (p=0.031). Subjects in the scopolamine group also required significantly less antiemetic treatment as compared to the placebo group while in the PACU or SDSU (9 versus 18 respectively) (p=0.016). VNRS scores for nausea were also noted to be significantly different between the groups at multiple time intervals (p< 0.05). It was also noted that those in the scopolamine group had a significantly lower incidence of PONV following discharge than the placebo group (1 versus 6, respectively) (p=0.043). This simple application of TD scopolamine has been shown to significantly reduce the incidence and severity of PONV in a group of patients who were at high risk for the development of PONV. This translated into a significant reduction in workload requirements for nursing personnel as well as an increase in overall patient comfort.