Paper
Friday, July 15, 2005
This presentation is part of : Assisting Children With Stressful Procedures
The Intersection of Health and Education for Children Who Are Medically Fragile
Roberta S. Rehm, PhD, RN, Family Health Care Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
Learning Objective #1: Discuss competing priorities faced by parents, nurses, and educators when children who are technology dependent and developmentally delayed attend school
Learning Objective #2: Analyze implications for nurses who educate teachers to care for children with complex needs at school

Purpose: The purpose of this secondary analysis was to identify and describe how families, nurses, and educators worked together and separately to facilitate educational goals for children who were both technology dependent and developmentally delayed. This presentation will report strategies used by parents, nurse case managers, school nurses, and teachers to facilitate academic growth while maintaining health and safety.

Background: All children are legally entitled to an appropriate public education regardless of health and developmental status; yet, providing a nurturing, safe environment that facilitates development is challenging when children are fragile and dependent on skilled care. Nurse case managers work with families and schools to facilitate enrollment, and educators and school nurses must provide services that maintain children's health and allow academic progress while maximizing parental trust.

Design and Methods: Two field studies were conducted, including parent interviews in family homes, and multiple site visits at 5 elementary schools and 1 high school in an urban school district in the Western U.S. Formal interviews included 26 mothers, 5 fathers, 8 nurse case managers, 7 school nurses, and 14 teachers. Eleven children were observed over the course of one school day. Thematic analysis was applied to interview and field note data

Results: The overarching themes of care at school were balancing complex needs and advocacy for specific requirements of individual children. Balancing occurred as parents sought social and skill building opportunities, yet feared for childrens' safety. Educators balanced the need to provide total care with the desire for academic progress. Parents, nurses, and teachers advocated for programs based on the health and skills of individual children.

Implications: Parents, nurses, and educators need skills in juggling complex negotiations that affect the health of children with multifaceted needs. Policy at every level must be directed to facilitating positive health and educational outcomes.