Paper
Friday, July 15, 2005
This presentation is part of : Prevention for HIV/AIDS
HIV Risk Reduction and Prevention Among Mexican Women in the United States
Patricia Yali, RN, BSN1, Nilda (Nena) Peragallo, RN, DrPH, FAAN1, Bruce R. DeForge, PhD2, and Elias Vasquez, PhD, NP, FAAN1. (1) School of Nursing, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA, (2) School of Social Work, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
Learning Objective #1: Identify the effectiveness of a culturally tailored intervention in increasing HIV prevention behaviors for Mexican women
Learning Objective #2: Identify specific attributes necessary to include in an intervention program to promote HIV risk reduction among Mexican women

Background: The purpose of this study was to test the effectiveness of the culturally tailored HIV risk reduction and prevention program in Mexican women.

Method: Latina women, aged 18-44, from several communities sited in Chicago, IL were recruited for this study. Women were randomly assigned to either an intervention or control group. Both groups were assessed at baseline, 6-week, 3-month and 6-month post intervention. The HIV risk reduction intervention consisted of the six weekly sessions including: condom use, sexual communication and negotiation, conflict management and violence prevention, problem solving, risk awareness, and peer support for change. The intervention results at the 3- and 6-month follow-up in a subsample (n=332) of Mexican women were analyzed.

Results: Mexican women in this sample had low acculturation levels; 86% of the interviewees were in Spanish, 87% lived with partners, and 72% had fewer than 2 lifetime partners. At the 3- and 6-month follow up, the intervention groups were more likely to use condoms. Adjusted odds ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI) were 1.939 (1.085±3.466) and 1.501 (.885±2.546), respectively. Also, the intervention group had higher HIV knowledge: difference scores and 95% CI were 2.883 (2.459±3.308) and 2.296 (1.887±2.705), respectively. For “health protective communication” where higher scores are better, the intervention group had higher scores: 2.068 (1.299±2.837) at 3-month and 1.012 (.247±1.778) at 6-month. For “risk reduction behavioral intentions” where higher scores are better, the intervention group had higher scores at 3-month: 1.113 (.485±1.742) and at 6-month: .559 (.000±1.118). For “perceived condom use barriers” where higher scores are better, the intervention group had higher scores at both 3-month and 6-month: 1.748 (1.077±2.418) and .997 (.343±1.652).

Conclusions: The program was highly successful in increasing HIV knowledge and decreasing risk behaviors among low income, Mexican women in the U.S. This intervention should be tested among other Latina subgroups.