Paper
   Wednesday, July 21,  2004
	
9:30 AM - 10:00 AM	
	Wednesday, July 21,  2004
	
2:30 PM - 3:00 PM	
 
 This presentation is part of : 
Posters 
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Hospital-Based Home Care Versus a Conventional Outpatient Follow-Up for Patients with Mental Illness
Sing-ling Tsai, RN, PhD, Nursing Department, Nursing Department, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, Taiwan
| Learning Objective #1: Describe the outcome measures of patients with schizophrenia living in the community | 
| Learning Objective #2: Compare the cost for service of home care for schzophrenia and outpatient department follow-up | 
Objective: the purpose of this study was to compare the outcome of a hospital-based home-care model and conventional outpatient follow-up for mentally ill patients in Taiwan using a cost-effectiveness analysis. Methods: eighty mentally ill patients discharged from the psychiatric wards in a medical center in Taiwan participated in this study.  The study design was a two group post hoc design.  We interviewed forty mentally ill patients who were followed up in the psychiatric outpatient department.  Another forty mentally ill patients who participated a hospital based home care program were also interviewed.  The outcome measures we used for interviews were disease maintenance behavior, psychotic symptoms, social function, service satisfaction, and cost. Results: cost-effectiveness analysis showed that hospital-based home care costs lower than conventional outpatient follow-up and over year period, hospital-based home care was associated with improvement in mental conditions, social functional outcomes, and service satisfaction. Conclusion: the improved outcomes of the mentally ill patients and lower cost in the hospital-based home care program support its cost-effectiveness.  The policy-makers may consider this analysis in resource allocation and policy development for care of mentally ill patients.           
          
  Back to Posters
  Back to  Evidence-Based Nursing:  Strategies for Improving Practice
Sigma Theta Tau International
July 21, 2004