Method: Analysis of faculty clinical activities, review of current affiliation agreements for limits of faculty to student ratio, review of current Board of Nursing requirements, and review of literature to determine if safety with faculty to student ratios had been studied.
Results: the analysis of clinical activities found 3 different types of clinical instruction. Nursing laboratory, where students were instructed in the labs at the university. Nursing clinical instruction, faculty accompanied groups of students to clinical facilities to provide patient care. This was further divided to direct care and direct and indirect care. Direct care courses faculty would accompany students to clinical facilities to provide direct care to a group of patients. Direct and indirect courses where students would attend facilities for direct care and also have facilities with indirect patient care. The third type was nursing practicum.
Review of affiliation agreements, it was found no mention of student to faculty ratios, except for the local children’s hospital. The children’s hospital directly stipulated 6 students per faculty. Without documentation, this was sent to the clinical faculty, they provided documentation from nursing leaders in facilities that limited students in certain units, CCU, PACU, ect.
Review of the Board of Nursing found the 10 students per faculty limit had been removed over 20 years ago. The Board of Nursing member stated the limit had been removed to allow schools of nursing to determine patient, student and faculty safety. They removed the limit to allow schools more flexibility for workload.
Review of the literature revealed little current research of faculty to student ratios in the clinical setting. Workload for faculty has been studied and revealed that due to several factors, increases in workload has led to decrease in numbers of faculty. Safety and patient outcomes were not addressed in respect to student to faculty ratios.
Collaborating with the Dean of the college and the nursing faculty the policy amendment was submitted to the policy process for change in spring 2016. It was returned twice to the dean and with some simple change in wording, the policy amendment was approved and implemented in spring 2017.