Paper
Monday, November 5, 2007

472
This presentation is part of : Theory and Method Issues
Using Scenarios in Qualitative Research: Experiences from a Women's Communication Study in Gaborone, Botswana
Mabel K. M. Magowe, BEd, MSc, Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA, Ora Lea Strickland, PhD, RN, FAAN, Family & Community Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA, and Marcia M. Holstad, DSN, Family Community Nursing, Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Learning Objective #1: discuss the use of scenarios for a qualitative research study
Learning Objective #2: obtain experiences from a qualitative research study using focus group discussions based on scripted scenarios and related open-ended discussion questions questions.

Introduction:

Research on sensitive topics such as human sexcality requires methods that can take into account potential participants' discomforts during data collection. The use of scenarios presents a potential method that can increase participation while protectineg the privacy of individuals, especially for exploring sensitive topics within a group setting. This paper provides information on the use of scenarios  for qualitative research. It also shares the results of qualitative study that applied scenarios for elicitation research.

Purpose:

1) To discuss the use of scenarios in qualitative research on sensitive issues.

2) To provide the results of a women's communication study that applied scenario-vignettes conducted in Gaborone, Botswana.

Methods

1) Intergarated literature review from MEDLINE, CINHAUL, PSYCHinfo, and GOOGLE.

2) Presentation of results of a women's communication study that applied scenarios, conducted in Gaborone, Botswana in the context of HIV prevention.

Results

Scenarios were found to be useful in qualitative research to explore sensitive topics. Six scenario-vignettes were developed based on extensive literature review and the researcher's experience working with women. Key themes were: consequences of discussing safer sex with partner, identification of significant referents in the relationship, motivation to comply with significant referents' aspirations, and self-efficacy for talking to partners about safer sex. Subthemes were: advantages and disadvantages of health protective sexual communication, influence of significant referents including partners, perceived ease or difficulty with, and effectiveness of safer sex communication for achieving safer sex protection. Facilitating factors were: partner's pesonality, the use of influence tactics, knowledge about HIV/AIDS and participatition in AIDS prevention programs. Barriers were: general difficulties in talking about sexual matters and the partner's non-response

Discussions:

Scenarios elicited useful data while encouraging participation and protecting the privacy of the women during qualitative research related to safer sex communication. Information collected was used to elicit themes that were used to derive instrument items  for a quantitative study to explore health protective sexual communication among young women in Botswana.

o
o
o