Learning Objective #1: Identify the variables in a Conceptual Model for Self-Care in a vulnerable popultaion of Heart Failure clients. | |||
Learning Objective #2: Explore the nursing and educational implications of spiritual well-being as a critical piece of psychosocial support for the vulnerable population of heart failure clients. |
Based on the findings from a preliminary qualitative study, Mishel’s (1988; 1990) Uncertainty in Illness theory and Braden’s Self-Help Model of Learned Response in Chronic Illness (1990), a conceptual model of self-care in heart failure was tested on 100 men and women with Class I and II heart failure. Path analysis was used to explore the path relationships among social support, spiritual well-being, uncertainty and self-care.
The exogenous variables of social support and spiritual well-being were moderately correlated and when social support was alone in the model, there was a statistical significant effect on self-care. However, when spiritual well-being was included with social support the effects of social support were dampened. Whereas spirituality explained 22% of the variance in uncertainty, uncertainty was not a significant predictor of self-care. The total model explained 36% of the variance in self-care for this heart failure population. Additionally, uncertainty was found to partially mediate the effect between social support and self-care as the relationship between social support and self-care was weakened by uncertainty.
Thus, spiritual well-being became the major variable within the model that served as a predictor of self-care. The strong bivariate relationships between spiritual well-being and self-care and spiritual well-being and uncertainty add to our body of knowledge that spiritual well-being serves as a resource for this chronic disease population.