Paper
Monday, November 5, 2007

471
This presentation is part of : Nursing Administration Initiatives
Job Satisfaction
Siriluck Kullavanitiwat, RN, MSN, Burn Unit, Nopparat Rajathanee Hospital, Kunnayao, Thailand and Areewan Oumtanee, RN, PhD, Faculty of Nursing, Chulalongkorn University, Pratumwan, Thailand.
Learning Objective #1: to understand the concept of Job satisfaction
Learning Objective #2: To examine predictors of Job satisfaction of staff nurses

The purposes of this study were to examine the relationship between working factors (experience and age), work environment, psychological empowerment, structural empowerment, head nurse-staff nurse exchange and job satisfaction and to study predictors of job satisfaction of staff  nurses working in a tertiary hospital. Study subjects consisted of 228 staff nurses.  Work environment, psychological empowerment , structural empowerment , head nurse-staff nurse exchange and  job satisfaction were used as a study conceptual framework and developed study questionnaires. The questionnaires of work environment, psychological empowerment , structural empowerment, head nurse-staff nurse exchange and job satisfaction  were tested for content validity and reliability with the alpha of .97, .97, .97 and .96 respectively. Statistical methods of frequency, mean, standard deviation, Pearson’s product moment correlation coefficient, and stepwise  multiple regression were used to analyze study data.
                Major  findings were as follows:
                1. Working experience and  age were not  related  to job satisfaction of staff  nurses.
                2.  Work environment,  head nurse-staff nurse exchange, structural empowerment psychological empowerment , were positively and significantly related to job satisfaction of staff  nurses, at .05 level (r =.762, .658, .657 and .611 respectively).
                2. Factors significantly predicted job satisfaction of staff  nurses were work environment, and head nurse-staff nurse exchange at .05 level. These predictors were accounted for 59 percents of variance (R2 =.590).