Paper
Saturday, 22 July 2006
Interventions to Improve Patient Education Regarding Multifactorial Genetic Conditions: A Systematic Review
Katherine G. Balk, MSN, CRNP, National Institute for Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health/Johns Hopkins University, Bethesda, MD, USA
Learning Objective #1: ...appreciate different interventions which have been researched for the communication of genetic information to patients at risk for conditions involving more than one gene. |
Learning Objective #2: ...compare the statistical significance of these various interventions in regard to outcomes such as knowledge gain/retention, anxiety, depression, risk perception, satisfaction with visit, etc. |
The
sequencing of the human genome will impact the delivery of health care
in significant way. One of these is the increase of genetic information
and diagnoses for patients. The understanding of multifactorial
disorders will increase, and patients may be able to know if they are
at risk for multifactorial genetic conditions, which involve several
genes and possibly environmental factors. This systematic literature
review of experimental trials of various interventions for patient education
regarding genetic information for multifactorial disorders attempts
to elucidate the answer to the question: is there sufficient evidence
for best practice for delivering genetic information to patients?
Various interventions (computer/ CD rom, group counseling, video/decision
aid, and miscellaneous) are analyzed in terms of quality criteria and
achievement of specific outcomes and rated according to the Stetler
model for evidence based practice. Seven
main outcomes were evaluated: 1.objective and subjective knowledge assessment
2.psychological measures (general anxiety, depression, stress, cancer
worry) 3.satisfaction/effectiveness of intervention 4.time spent in
counseling (time spent on basic genetic information vs. specific concerns)
5.decision making/intent to undergo genetic testing 6.treatment choice
and value of that choice, and, finally 7.risk perception. Findings
were compared based on whether or not interventions achieved statistically
significant changes in outcomes. Overall, the computer interventions
resulted in more statistically significant findings that were beneficial
than any other category, followed by the video category, although the
group and miscellaneous categories did not measure all of the outcomes
reported by the other two categories. Nevertheless, while these
groups had neutral or negative findings in some of the outcomes, the
computer intervention group showed statistically significant improvement
in genetics knowledge, psychological measures, satisfaction/effectiveness,
time spent with counselor, and decision/intent to undergo testing.
See more of Implementing Evidence-Based Nursing
See more of The 17th International Nursing Research Congress Focusing on Evidence-Based Practice (19-22 July 2006)