Paper
Thursday, 20 July 2006
This presentation is part of : Creating an Evidence-Based Nursing Environment
Defining an Evidence-Based Environment for Nursing Practice
Anne Marie Kotzer, PhD, RN, Nursing Research and Education, The Children's Hospital and University of Colorado School of Nursing, Denver, CO, USA
Learning Objective #1: Describe and evaluate staff nurses' perceptions of their work environment.
Learning Objective #2: Compare and contrast staff nurses' perceptions of their real (current) and ideal (preferred) work setting.

Background/Purpose: A direct relationship has been demonstrated between job satisfaction, retention, turnover, patient safety and elements of the nurses' work environment. Administrative efforts to alter the work environment may not be consistent with nurses' assessment of what is important. The purpose of this study was to describe and compare staff nurses' perceptions of their real and their ideal work setting. Methods: Using a descriptive survey design, a convenience sample of 385 nurses on five inpatient units and the float team at a pediatric hospital answered a demographics questionnaire and the Work Environment Scale (WES) (Moos, 1994). The WES consists of ten subscales within three dimensions: Relationship (involvement, peer cohesion, supervisor support), Personal Growth (autonomy, task orientation, work pressure), and System Maintenance and Change (clarity, control, innovation, physical comfort). Two assessment forms measured the real (R) or current work environment and the ideal (I) or preferred work environment. Findings: The overall response rate was 40%. The majority of nurses worked full-time, ranged in age from 20 to 35 years, and worked as an RN < 6 years. Possible scores ranged from 0 – 9. Units reported high levels of Involvement, Peer Cohesion, Task Orientation, and Managerial Control (6 to 9). Scores for Work Pressure and Autonomy were moderate-high (3 to <9) and Physical Comfort, Supervisor Support, Clarity and Innovation were moderate (3 to <6). Across all units, Involvement scored highest and Physical Comfort lowest. Statistically significant differences were seen between all real and ideal subscale scores except for Managerial Control on three units. Implications: Despite moderate work pressure reported, staff affirmed a highly positive work environment on their units. Significant differences between real and ideal subscale scores suggest opportunities for targeted interventions. Plans are underway to identify and prioritize areas for improvement, establish goals, and develop action plans for change.

See more of Creating an Evidence-Based Nursing Environment
See more of The 17th International Nursing Research Congress Focusing on Evidence-Based Practice (19-22 July 2006)