Poster Presentation
Thursday, 20 July 2006
10:00 AM - 10:30 AM
Thursday, 20 July 2006
3:00 PM - 3:30 PM
This presentation is part of : Poster Presentations II
Nursing Aphasia Assessment Tool
James Denman, RN, BSN, CNR, UCDMC, Sacramento, CA, USA, Rosa Asad, RN, CNR, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA, Raquel Resuello, RN, CNRN, ADN, Center for Nursing Research, UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA, Christine Davis, PhD, Chief Speech-Language Pathology Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, UCDMC, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA, Bonnie Jean Raingruber, RN, PhD, Division of Nursing and Center for Nursing Research, California State University, Sacramento, and University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA, and Alicia Bengs, RN, BSN, Homecare, Lifemasters, Rancho Cordova, CA, USA.
Learning Objective #1: describe three differences between two types of aphasia.
Learning Objective #2: demonstrate two methods to communicate effectively with aphasic patients.

Objectives: (1) To design a tool to improve communication between nurses and vulnerable patients with acute onset stroke who suffer from aphasia. (2) To help families communicate with their aphasic family member. (3) To conduct a survey regarding the effectiveness of the tool.

Setting, Design, and Method: The research was conducted at a 500-bed, magnet-designated, university teaching hospital in northern California. In collaboration with a speech pathologist, we developed a tool and video to assess patients with aphasia. Nurses and families are given a handout to guide assessments and provide helpful communication hints.

A Likert scale was used to evaluate the effectiveness of the tool. It was given to 50 nurses and 100 family members two weeks after they received training and had been using the tool.

Concept Target:

A tool using video, power point and an aphasia worksheet was designed to improve nurse, family, and patient communication. The tool walked the nurse through an aphasia assessment, first determining if the patient was fluent or non-fluent, then continuing to evaluate simple and more complex auditory processing followed by yes/no questions and word repetition testing. The training session provided video examples of patients with different types of aphasia shown during a speech pathologist’s assessment.

Findings:

Nurses reported the tool improved their assessment and communication skills.

Conclusions:

Knowledge from speech pathology can be integrated into nursing practice with use of the UCD Nursing Aphasia Assessment Tool.

Implications:

Nurses need practical ways to understand and treat aphasic patients. This became evident when we conducted a literature review. There was an absence of nursing research providing guidance-to-practice related to aphasia. The evidence-based tool we have developed is an effective way to improve quality of patient care and communication.

See more of Poster Presentations II
See more of The 17th International Nursing Research Congress Focusing on Evidence-Based Practice (19-22 July 2006)