Learning Objective #1: The learner will be able to discuss the benefits of skin-to-skin holding as they relate to neonatal outcome. | |||
Learning Objective #2: The learner will be able to describe the differences in breastmilk for women who skin-to-skin hold their infants. |
Hypothesis: There is a significant difference in composition of maternal breastmilk pumped after skin-to-skin holding premature infants as compared to breastmilk pumped after non-holding conditions.
Design: Repeated measures crossover design. Dependent variable: maternal response measured in caloric composition of maternal breastmilk. Independent variable: skin-to-skin holding intervention.
Sample: Paired sample of 12 breastfeeding first-time mothers.
Instrument: All maternal breastmilk was tested for caloric composition using a Creamatocrit Plus centrifuge. The Creamatocrit technique is especially useful to guide the fractionation of breast milk.
Procedure: After obtaining a signed informed consent from the infants’ mother, a 4-day study schedule was determined. Each mother had a consistent breast milk pumping schedule throughout study enrollment, held her infant for an hour in the SCN twice during the study at a consistent time of day, and pumped within 30 minutes after holding. All expressed maternal breast milk was recorded during study enrollment for volume and composition results.
Data Analysis: The hypothesis of this study was tested using repeated measures ANOVA. Both milk volume (ml) and milk composition (cal/ml) immediately after holding were compared to all other conditions. The composition showed a clear difference between conditions, thereby supporting the hypothesis (p<0.005).
Implications: The results imply that composition may be a more effective measurement to use when studying the effects of skin-to-skin holding on mother’s breastmilk. This data makes a very good argument for the consistent implementation of holding in clinical practice.