Learning Objective #1: examine and compare sleep patterns of patients with restless legs syndrome with normal group by an actigraph. | |||
Learning Objective #2: learn about Restless legs syndrome(RLS) as sensorimotor disorders. |
There were significant differences between normal group and RLS group on sleep efficiency (U=215.00, p=.001) and number of awakenings (U=294.50, p=.033) that had been measured by an actigraph.There were significant differences between normal group and RLS group on sleep latency (U=198.50, p=.000), sleep efficiency (U=262.50, p=.009), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (U=8.00, p=.001) and Insomnia Severity Index (U=7.50, p=.001) that had been measured by subjective sleep parameters.
There were significant positive correlation on total sleep time (r=.643, p=.000) and the number of awakenings (r=.434, p=.001) between sleep parameters measured by an actigraph and sleep parameters measured by sleep diary.
In the above results, patients with restless leg syndrome have sleep problem about decreased sleep efficiency and increased number of awakenings. Therefore, the actigraph applied was a useful indicator for evaluating sleep. I suggest that an actigraph should be used as an objective measurement tool in assessing sleep patterns and evaluating effects of the treatment on subjects having sleep problems.