Paper
Wednesday, July 11, 2007
This presentation is part of : Nursing Education Initatives
The Case for Peer Teaching: Implications for Nursing Education
Sally S. Blowers, RN, PhD1, Priscilla Ramsey, RN, PhD1, and Carolyn Merriman, APRN, MS, BC2. (1) Department of Adult Nursing, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, USA, (2) Family/Community Nursing, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, USA
Learning Objective #1: identify the merits of peer teaching.
Learning Objective #2: evaluate the feasibility and benefits of incorporating peer tutoring as a teaching/learning method in a nursing program.

 

 

The call to evidence-based practice rightly extends to nursing education. There is an urgent need to identify and validate alternatives to the standard teaching practices used in most nursing programs in order to maximize our teaching effectiveness and our educational outcomes in this era of nursing shortage. This qualitative case study offers support for the practice of peer teaching as an effective educational strategy.

 

A formal peer tutoring program was established in a four-year baccalaureate nursing program in a regional Appalachian university's College of Nursing. The program includes recruitment, individualized tutor training, centralized communication, a convenient location for tutoring activities, a salary for tutors (without charge to the tutorees*), and resources for tutors. Following the initial semester of implementation, a pilot study was conducted to identify the quality and effects of peer teaching, and to understand the nature of the peer tutor/tutoree relationship from the perspectives of the participants. Twelve peer tutors and 14 tutorees were interviewed by the faculty director of the peer tutor program. A two-part guiding question was used to initiate each interview: Please talk about the best/worst tutoring session you have experienced. The interviews were audio-taped and transcribed verbatim, then analyzed for common themes. The themes were then presented to two focus groups to check for correspondence between the data and their experiences. Additional data included Likert-scale evaluation forms completed by both tutors and tutorees.

 

Preliminary data analysis indicates that peer tutors use essentially the same teaching techniques and methods as faculty. However, the outcomes of peer teaching indicate that learners more often achieve deep learning (as opposed to surface learning) when taught by peers and that the peer teacher/peer learner relationship is broader in scope, more significant, and often more long-lasting than the faculty/student relationship.

 

*The word tutoree is used throughout instead of “tutee.”