The results of this study illustrate graduate students’ understanding of the competencies recommended by the Institute of Medicine. Participants viewed patients as part of a vulnerable population if they were unable to easily access health care and follow through with recommended treatments. Although the participants encountered many vulnerable groups during their clinical rotations, they sometimes felt unprepared to meet their multiple and complex needs from their own unique disciplinary perspectives. The participants recognized the value of interprofessional teamwork and education in the development of more holistic, patient-centered plans of care. Additionally, the participants offered their perspective on where gaps in their education could be addressed to help them more easily meet the needs of vulnerable populations.
The participants noted that curricular changes within their graduate programs could better prepare them for interdisciplinary teamwork which could, in turn, positively change clinical practice. IP education has been identified as an important part of graduate education, but to date it has not been incorporated into many programs (Hanyok, Walton-Moss, Tanner, Stewart, & Becker, 2013). When placed in interprofessional learning environments, students can observe how others function and then identify how they can contribute to the work of the team from their own unique perspective (Thistlewaite, 2012). This type of educational preparation can lead to better collaboration among health care providers, which can improve clinical care, reduce health care costs, and improve job satisfaction (Bajnok, Puddester, MacDonald, Archibald, & Kuhl, 2012). More research is needed to determine whether the experiences of our students with vulnerable populations is common among graduate students. The suggestions for curricular enhancement may be useful to other educators seeking student perspectives on interdisciplinary education.