Paper
Friday, July 13, 2007
This presentation is part of : Children's Mental Health Issues
Adoptive Families Create Environments for Resilience for Children Adopted from the Former Soviet Union: A Mid-Adolescent Follow-up
Teena M. McGuinness, PhD, APRN, BC, Community Mental Health Nursing, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA, Janyce G. Dyer, PhD, CRNP, School of Nursing, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA, and Kristina Schneider, College of Nursing, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AR, USA.
Learning Objective #1: The learner will be able to identify risk factors to the development of children adopted from the former Soviet Union.
Learning Objective #2: The learner will be able to identify how specific aspects of adoptive family environment benefit children who were institutionalized during infancy.

Adoptive Families Create Environments for Resilience for Children Adopted from the Former Soviet Union: A Mid-Adolescent Follow-up Objective: To evaluate the impact of family environment on the competence of children adopted from Russia. Design and Sample: A cohort of 105 children adopted by U.S. families has been followed prospectively since 1998. These children have experienced multiple early adversities. At time I (n=105; mean age 7.7 years), risk factors included prenatal alcohol exposure (41%), institutionalization during sensitive developmental periods (100%), and abuse (57%) were described. Concepts and Variables Studied Together: We examined the impact of family environment as a predictor of child academic, social and conduct competence. Methods: Mailings were sent to adoptive families recruited from five adoption agencies in 1997-98 inviting them to participate in an initial study and follow-up study seven years later. Data were collected via telephone and mail survey. Thirty families participated in the follow-up study in mid-adolescence with 25 completing all questionnaires. Findings: Scores on family environment subdomains remained positive and essentially unchanged. At mid-adolescence (n=30; mean age of children, 15.1), outcomes in social and conduct competence had improved but the academic competence measure declined slightly. Many children continue to face academic challenges; 13 children were described by their parents as having reading abilities below grade level and 57% received special services such as speech therapy and supplemental reading, math, and science support. Multiple regression analysis of total competence showed two significant predictors: birth weight and family environment (cohesion), resulting in a significant model fit (R2=.398, adjusted R2=.344). Conclusions: Many children face academic challenges: 56% read below grade level. However, given the positive and supportive family environment, social and conduct competence continues to improve. Implications: Adoptive family environment makes a significant difference in child competence for children adopted from the former USSR.