Conceptual Frameworks: Pender’s health promotion model; theories of social learning, Bloom’s learning domains and composite cognition.
Methods: Various scenarios were reviewed for relevance to student nurses and for feasibility; the decision was made to use a web-enhanced tabletop exercise. Pandemic disaster was chosen because of its importance, applicability to nursing, and ease of presenting in this format. The scenario was developed using progressive simulated news reports, graphics, and unfolding cases. Students were “situated” in their own communities and were acting as nurses in their own neighborhoods to give them a more authentic, personal experience. Students were placed in groups of four at individual computers to progress at their own rates through the simulation and engage in group process; each student/group contributed to the exercise through submitting injects during the unfolding cases. Up to five faulty members or outside assistants were present as expert observers and in case students felt uncomfortable with the program. Students were asked to make decisions on preparation, quarantine, when and how to assist others, and disaster triage, including whether a key member of the “team” should die. Some scenarios were difficult and intense. A “hotwash” debriefing was conducted for both students and faculty at the end of the simulation. To date, approximately 150 pre-and post-licensure nursing students have participated in the pandemic disaster simulation as part of the larger disaster nursing course.
Results: At the debriefing, more than 93% of students felt that they were better prepared for a pandemic and for disasters in general. Students in different groups had different reactions to the scenarios ranging from “I could never let someone die” to “we don’t have the means to save that person”. Students were surprised at the level of social destruction in a pandemic. All said they were thinking about their own personal preparedness and how they would respond differently after being in the class and going through the scenario. Modifications were made to the simulation based on feedback.
Conclusions/Implications: During times of disaster, nurses are a critical component of our national response plan. National and international nursing organizations support disaster education in nursing. Pandemics are terrifying disasters that will tax the healthcare system and require extensive planning, preparation, and training/exercises. The use of low cost simulations that are portable and require minimal equipment are an effective way to bring this important training to large numbers of student nurses leading to a better prepared workforce. Faculty need more training in the use of exercises for disaster education; additional practice opportunities with community agencies need to be explored.